Cross-tenant data exposure
One tenant can read another tenant’s data by swapping identifiers.
Why scanners miss it: Needs two tenant sessions to compare responses.
Pentest every pull request before it ships
Your team ships fast. Neo makes sure nothing exploitable gets through. Every pull request is tested the way an attacker would, and findings land as PR comments with proof, not alerts you have to chase.
Engineering got 10x faster.
Security didn't.
AI copilots, code generation, and accelerated release cycles mean more features ship every day than security teams can review. The result is a growing blind spot between velocity and validation.
01Code velocity
PRs outpace security reviews
AI-assisted development has compressed shipping cycles from weeks to hours. Engineers merge more PRs in a day than teams used to ship in a sprint.
02Security review
Manual review is now the bottleneck
Security teams still review code the same way they did five years ago. The volume of AI-generated code has made manual review a bottleneck that delays releases or gets skipped entirely.
03Existing tools
Alerts without proof get ignored
SAST flags patterns while AI reviewers add more guesses. Neither proves exploitability. Developers learn to ignore both and real vulnerabilities slip through.
Ship fast without shipping vulnerabilities
Every PR triggers a full pentest cycle — recon, analysis, exploit, report. If something is exploitable, you know before it merges. If it's not, you ship with confidence.
What the developer sees
Open a PR - get exploitable vulnerabilities with proof. Commit a fix - Neo retests and confirms the remediation. All within the PR workflow, no context switching.
01Input
Code mapping
Maps every endpoint, parameter, and auth flow from the PR diff with full repository context. Understands routes, handlers, and trust boundaries.
02Discover
AI reasoning
Traces input from source to sink across functions and files. Understands renamed parameters, missing sanitization, and broken auth checks. Builds a threat model for every code change.
03Exploit
Runtime Validation
Spins up a real browser, authenticates, and launches actual exploits against the running PR environment. Captures HTTP traces, screenshots, and full exploit chains as proof.
04Report
PR Comment with Proof
Every finding is posted as a PR comment: vulnerability class, affected code lines, confirmed exploit with evidence, and remediation guidance. Not an alert. Verified proof that developers can act on immediately.
05Verify
Verified Remediation
Developer pushes a fix. Neo retests the same exploit to confirm the vulnerability is resolved. Closed-loop validation within the same PR.
The vulnerabilities you can't afford to merge
Traditional tools find "maybe". Neo validates the exploitability of the most complex risks by dynamically testing them in preview builds.
Workflow step skipping
Skip required steps and call the final endpoint to get an approved outcome.
Why scanners miss it: Tools test endpoints in isolation, not state sequences.
Broken object ownership
Change an ID and access another user’s resource.
Why scanners miss it: Requires two users to prove ownership enforcement.
Multi-tenant invoice API
The UI hides admin controls, but the backend still accepts the request.
Why scanners miss it: Needs real browser context plus backend verification.
Race and double-spend
Parallel requests break rules like single-use limits or balance checks.
Why scanners miss it: Sequential scans rarely hit timing windows.
Checkout price tampering
Modify price or quantity in a request and still complete checkout.
Why scanners miss it: Tools don’t know expected prices or business rules.
Every PR reviewed and pentested
Continuous pentesting that scales with your engineering velocity. Runs on every code change, not on a quarterly schedule.
15 minutes
to complete security reviews
80%
less time spent verifying findings
100%
evidence-backed findings